1984-1985 KANSAS CITY KINGS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
REGULAR SEASON STATS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PLAYER NAME | P | GP | GS | MIN | MPG | PTS | PPG | FGM/A | FG% | 3PM/A | 3P% | FTM/A | FT% | OR | ORG | DR | DRG | TR | TRG | AST | APG | A/TO | TO | TPG | STL | SPG | BLK | BPG | PF | FPG | Def | SALARY | PLAYER NAME |
84-85 Fat Lever | PG | 82 | 82 | 2665 | 32.5 | 1010 | 12.3 | 403/1006 | 40.1% | 9/36 | 25.0% | 195/238 | 81.9% | 155 | 1.9 | 317 | 3.9 | 472 | 5.8 | 517 | 6.3 | 2.95 | 175 | 2.1 | 178 | 2.2 | 43 | 0.5 | 194 | 2.4 | 89 | $5,513,064 | 84-85 Fat Lever |
84-85 Mike Gminski | C | 80 | 80 | 2509 | 31.4 | 1032 | 12.9 | 394/830 | 47.5% | 0/1 | 0.0% | 244/286 | 85.3% | 262 | 3.3 | 479 | 6.0 | 741 | 9.3 | 159 | 2.0 | 1.23 | 129 | 1.6 | 33 | 0.4 | 112 | 1.4 | 114 | 1.4 | 41 | $5,324,219 | 84-85 Mike Gminski |
84-85 Roy Hinson | PF | 82 | 82 | 2276 | 27.8 | 1071 | 13.1 | 447/907 | 49.3% | 0/4 | 0.0% | 177/258 | 68.6% | 198 | 2.4 | 419 | 5.1 | 617 | 7.5 | 60 | 0.7 | 0.40 | 149 | 1.8 | 51 | 0.6 | 184 | 2.2 | 240 | 2.9 | 61 | $5,194,455 | 84-85 Roy Hinson |
84-85 Mike Woodson | SG | 80 | 80 | 2031 | 25.4 | 1301 | 16.3 | 506/1059 | 47.8% | 9/32 | 28.1% | 280/348 | 80.5% | 85 | 1.1 | 127 | 1.6 | 212 | 2.7 | 135 | 1.7 | 0.99 | 137 | 1.7 | 110 | 1.4 | 41 | 0.5 | 196 | 2.5 | 56 | $4,150,049 | 84-85 Mike Woodson |
84-85 Bill Hanzlik | SF | 82 | 0 | 1672 | 20.4 | 563 | 6.9 | 213/525 | 40.6% | 4/29 | 13.8% | 133/175 | 76.0% | 86 | 1.0 | 139 | 1.7 | 225 | 2.7 | 165 | 2.0 | 1.72 | 96 | 1.2 | 72 | 0.9 | 25 | 0.3 | 212 | 2.6 | 50 | $2,585,275 | 84-85 Bill Hanzlik |
84-85 Wes Matthews | PG | 75 | 2 | 1575 | 21.0 | 528 | 7.0 | 227/484 | 46.9% | 3/12 | 25.0% | 71/97 | 73.2% | 15 | 0.2 | 50 | 0.7 | 65 | 0.9 | 312 | 4.2 | 2.17 | 144 | 1.9 | 56 | 0.7 | 21 | 0.3 | 111 | 1.5 | 37 | $2,255,127 | 84-85 Wes Matthews |
84-85 Dan Roundfield | PF | 80 | 0 | 1553 | 19.4 | 679 | 8.5 | 272/576 | 47.2% | 0/5 | 0.0% | 135/186 | 72.6% | 188 | 2.4 | 322 | 4.0 | 510 | 6.4 | 92 | 1.2 | 0.75 | 122 | 1.5 | 31 | 0.4 | 73 | 0.9 | 118 | 1.5 | 58 | $2,941,794 | 84-85 Dan Roundfield |
84-85 Cedric Maxwell | SF | 82 | 17 | 1525 | 18.6 | 703 | 8.6 | 262/494 | 53.0% | 1/4 | 25.0% | 178/214 | 83.2% | 123 | 1.5 | 156 | 1.9 | 279 | 3.4 | 84 | 1.0 | 0.82 | 102 | 1.2 | 40 | 0.5 | 16 | 0.2 | 111 | 1.4 | 30 | $2,840,480 | 84-85 Cedric Maxwell |
84-85 Rich Kelley | C | 82 | 2 | 1313 | 16.0 | 346 | 4.2 | 135/266 | 50.8% | 0/5 | 0.0% | 76/100 | 76.0% | 142 | 1.7 | 262 | 3.2 | 404 | 4.9 | 107 | 1.3 | 0.90 | 119 | 1.5 | 42 | 0.5 | 33 | 0.4 | 147 | 1.8 | 46 | $1,898,738 | 84-85 Rich Kelley |
61-62 Phil Jordon | C | 82 | 0 | 1224 | 14.9 | 541 | 6.6 | 221/521 | 42.4% | 11/32 | 34.4% | 88/143 | 61.5% | 79 | 1.0 | 149 | 1.8 | 228 | 2.8 | 83 | 1.0 | 1.05 | 79 | 1.0 | 34 | 0.4 | 56 | 0.7 | 121 | 1.5 | 22 | $3,279,293 | 61-62 Phil Jordon |
84-85 George L. Johnson | SF | 67 | 65 | 806 | 12.0 | 295 | 4.4 | 111/315 | 35.2% | 5/36 | 13.9% | 68/75 | 90.7% | 76 | 1.1 | 138 | 2.1 | 214 | 3.2 | 31 | 0.5 | 0.55 | 56 | 0.8 | 25 | 0.4 | 16 | 0.2 | 106 | 1.6 | 74 | $1,172,585 | 84-85 George L. Johnson |
84-85 Kevin McKenna | SG | 65 | 0 | 564 | 8.7 | 205 | 3.2 | 66/173 | 38.2% | 13/37 | 35.1% | 60/68 | 88.2% | 28 | 0.4 | 34 | 0.5 | 62 | 1.0 | 44 | 0.7 | 0.96 | 46 | 0.7 | 32 | 0.5 | 9 | 0.1 | 61 | 0.9 | 54 | $738,455 | 84-85 Kevin McKenna |
KANSAS CITY KINGS | 19713 | 240.4 | 8274 | 100.9 | 3257/7156 | 45.5% | 55/233 | 23.6% | 1705/2188 | 77.9% | 1437 | 17.5 | 2592 | 31.6 | 4029 | 49.1 | 1789 | 21.8 | 1.32 | 1354 | 16.5 | 704 | 8.6 | 629 | 7.7 | 1731 | 21.1 | 53.2 | $37,893,534 | KANSAS CITY KINGS | |||
OFFENSIVE RANKINGS | 18 | 19 | 23 | 4 | 3 | 17 | 13 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 13 | 5 | 22 | 11 | 16 | OFFENSIVE RANKINGS | |||||||||||||||||
OPPONENTS TOTALS | 19713 | 240.4 | 8494 | 103.6 | 3317/6891 | 48.1% | 98/344 | 28.5% | 1762/2354 | 74.9% | 1229 | 15.0 | 2677 | 32.6 | 3906 | 47.6 | 1918 | 23.4 | 1.46 | 1317 | 16.1 | 708 | 8.6 | 517 | 6.3 | 1631 | 19.9 | 4th | Midwest | OPPONENTS TOTALS | |||
DEFENSIVE RANKINGS | 8 | 11 | 1 | 7 | 12 | 14 | 11 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 12 | 6 | 38-44 | DEFENSIVE RANKINGS |